In the wake of the Lloyds TSB takeover of HBOS (does anyone really believe that it's a merger?) there has been an outbreak of "agreement" up here in the Scottish Parliament.
First Minister Alex Salmond called short selling, which he blamed for the demise of HBOS, economic vandalism. Scottish Liberal Democrat leader Tavish Scott welcomed the suspension of short selling saying "Rich kids in bright shirts in London, New York and Tokyo are making money at our expence, Scotland loses its bank, people lose their branches and the country is worse off." In fact all parties were in broad agreement on the the issue.
However Patrick Harvie of the Green Party took a swipe at the other parties. While he also welcomed the UK Government's action in respect of short selling, he said "Isn't the root cause of the problem the culture of deregulated buccaneer capitalism which all of these political parties have supported, celebrated and even courted?"
I have to admit that my own opinion leans toward his. We all recognise that a free society needs policing. So why should the financial markets be different? Perhaps if the Financial Services Authority had spent less time going after easy targets, like independent mortgage brokers, and more time on the banks and the city things might have been different.
While everyone is rightly criticising the "spivs and speculators" in the city lets not forget that the banks have been acting like spivs for years by ripping off their own customers with their outrageous charges.
And doesn't bad management also come into the equation?

